United Methodists, Southern Baptists, and War

April 30, 2007 at 1:26 pm 4 comments

I thought it might be interesting to look at statements on war from United Methodists and Southern Baptists.

Here first is the statement from the United Methodist social principles:

We believe war is incompatible with the teachings and example of Christ. We therefore reject war as an instrument of national foreign policy, to be employed only as a last resort in the prevention of such evils as genocide, brutal suppression of human rights, and unprovoked international aggression. We insist that the first moral duty of all nations is to resolve by peaceful means every dispute that arises between or among them; that human values must outweigh military claims as governments determine their priorities; that the militarization of society must be challenged and stopped; that the manufacture, sale, and deployment of armaments must be reduced and controlled; and that the production, possession, or use of nuclear weapons be condemned. Consequently, we endorse general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.

From The Book of Discipline of The United Methodist Church – 2004. Copyright 2004 by The United Methodist Publishing House. Used by permission.

This is from the Southern Baptist’s document, The Baptist Faith and Message, and I suppose we could see this as a Southern Baptist statement on war.

XVI. Peace and War

It is the duty of Christians to seek peace with all men on principles of righteousness. In accordance with the spirit and teachings of Christ they should do all in their power to put an end to war.

The true remedy for the war spirit is the gospel of our Lord. The supreme need of the world is the acceptance of His teachings in all the affairs of men and nations, and the practical application of His law of love. Christian people throughout the world should pray for the reign of the Prince of Peace.

Isaiah 2:4; Matthew 5:9,38-48; 6:33; 26:52; Luke 22:36,38; Romans 12:18-19; 13:1-7; 14:19; Hebrews 12:14; James 4:1-2.

Although I’m sure there are differences in the way each denomination views the documents here, I find it interesting that the SBs give no possible excuse for war, whereas we UMs suggest war can be employed as a last resort.  What differences do you see?

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Methodism, Methodist, Religion, United Methodist.

Sunday Sermon: The Troublesome Trinity Lessons from Megachurches

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. jmeunier  |  April 30, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    I read the SBs as saying that the only way to end war is to convert everyone to Christ.

    If I’m reading it properly, it says that war is not acceptable, but the SBs don’t expect us to do anything to stop it beyond prayer.

    The SBs are saying what individual Christians should do. The UM position is talking about what nation’s should do.

    Reply
  • 2. Matt  |  April 30, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    You’re right j. Unfortunately that’s a very short-sighted position to hold. One need only think of several violent wars between Christians throughout history.

    Thanks for your thoughts!

    Reply
  • 3. jmeunier  |  May 1, 2007 at 10:12 am

    Thanks for you blog.

    Reply
  • 4. Matt  |  May 1, 2007 at 11:16 am

    You’re very welcome…BTW thanks for the “blogroll love” on your site!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Catching Photos

April 2007
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Blog Stats

  • 43,471 Meddlers

%d bloggers like this: